The recent enactment of new maritime laws by the Philippines has reignited tensions with Malaysia, particularly concerning the longstanding dispute over Sabah’s maritime boundaries.
This comprehensive analysis delves into the historical context, legal aspects, and potential consequences of this complex geopolitical issue.
Historical Context of the Sabah Dispute
The roots of the Sabah dispute trace back to the colonial era, with both Malaysia and the Philippines laying claim to the region based on historical agreements and interpretations.
The controversy centers around an 1878 agreement between the Sultan of Sulu and representatives of the British North Borneo Company.
The ambiguity in the term “pajakkan” used in this agreement has led to conflicting interpretations, with the Philippines viewing it as a lease and Malaysia considering it a cession of sovereignty.
Sabah, formerly known as North Borneo, was originally under the Sultanate of Brunei’s rule before being ceded to the Sultanate of Sulu in 1658.
The territory later came under British administration, first through the British North Borneo Company and then as a British protectorate and Crown Colony.
In 1963, Sabah joined the Federation of Malaysia following a referendum, a move that Malaysia considers an exercise of self-determination by the Sabah population.
The Philippines first officially claimed Sabah in 1962, arguing that sovereignty remained with the Sultanate of Sulu.
This claim has persisted into the modern era, with occasional diplomatic flare-ups between the two nations.
Recent Philippine Maritime Laws
The Philippines has recently enacted two significant laws aimed at defining and asserting its maritime boundaries and territorial claims in the South China Sea:
- The Philippine Maritime Zones Act (RA 12064):
This law delineates the country’s maritime zones, including internal waters, archipelagic waters, territorial sea, contiguous zone, Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), and continental shelf.
It establishes the Philippines’ sovereign rights to explore and exploit resources within these zones, in compliance with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).
- The Philippine Archipelagic Sea Lanes Act (RA 12065):
This act allows the Philippines to designate sea lanes and air routes within its archipelago, setting out rights and obligations for the passage of foreign ships and aircraft.
These laws are based on the 2016 ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague, which invalidated China’s extensive territorial claims in the South China Sea.
However, the enactment of these laws has not only intensified tensions with China but also with Malaysia, as they potentially overlap with Malaysia’s territorial claims, particularly around Sabah.
Malaysia’s Official Response
In response to these new Philippine laws, Malaysia has announced its intention to send a formal protest note to the Philippines.
This diplomatic move expresses Malaysia’s discontent and seeks a resolution to the overlapping claims.
While the specific contents of the protest note have not been publicly disclosed, it is likely to emphasize Malaysia’s legal and historical claims to the disputed territories.
This protest is a significant diplomatic gesture that could impact Malaysia-Philippines relations.
Both countries are members of ASEAN and have historically maintained cooperative relations, but this maritime boundary dispute poses a challenge to their bilateral ties.
Legal Aspects and International Maritime Law
The Sabah maritime boundary dispute falls under the purview of international maritime law, primarily governed by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).
UNCLOS provides guidelines for defining territorial seas, exclusive economic zones (EEZs), and continental shelves.
The convention is crucial in resolving disputes by providing a legal basis for maritime delimitation.
Key principles in maritime boundary delimitation include equidistance and equitable solutions, which aim to ensure fair division of maritime spaces between states.
These principles would be essential in determining the rightful maritime boundaries between Malaysia and the Philippines in the context of Sabah.
International courts, such as the International Court of Justice (ICJ), can play a role in resolving such disputes.
Malaysia has previously resorted to international adjudication to settle maritime boundary issues, which could be a viable path for the Sabah dispute.
Additionally, negotiation and mediation are alternative methods encouraged by international maritime law to resolve disputes amicably.
Potential Consequences
The ongoing dispute over Sabah’s maritime boundaries has significant implications for both Malaysia and the Philippines:
Economic Implications
- Resource Exploitation:
The dispute can impact economic activities in areas rich in natural resources. The fear of potential conflict or legal action may deter investment and exploitation of resources such as oil, gas, and fisheries.
- Trade and Maritime Transport:
The South China Sea, which includes the disputed areas, is a critical maritime route for global trade.
Disputes in this region can disrupt shipping routes, leading to increased costs and delays in trade, affecting both countries’ economies.
- Tourism:
Prolonged disputes can affect tourism in coastal areas, potentially leading to a decline in tourism revenue and impacting local economies.
Security Implications
- Military Tensions:
The dispute may lead to increased military presence and activities in the disputed areas, potentially escalating tensions and leading to conflicts.
- Regional Stability:
The situation could impact regional stability, especially considering the strategic competition between major powers like China and the United States in the South China Sea.
- Diplomatic Relations:
The dispute strains diplomatic relations between Malaysia and the Philippines, potentially affecting cooperation on other regional issues such as counter-terrorism, human trafficking, and environmental protection.
In Summary,
The Sabah maritime boundary dispute between Malaysia and the Philippines is a complex issue with deep historical roots and significant contemporary implications.
The recent enactment of maritime laws by the Philippines has brought this longstanding dispute back into focus, prompting Malaysia’s diplomatic protest.
Resolving this dispute will require careful negotiation, adherence to international maritime law, and potentially the involvement of international arbitration bodies.
The outcome will have far-reaching consequences for regional stability, economic development, and diplomatic relations in Southeast Asia.
Found this article interesting, and useful? Please feel free to interact, recommend and share.
If you have any questions about this topic or would like to discuss your own business needs, please contact us today!